Sample Resume The Flavia Fusion Essay - 1611 Words

I have been interested in the one cup coffee brewers for some time. However, I was put off by the high price tag and the high cost per cup of coffee when compared to traditional coffee pots. I finally broke down and purchased a Flavia Fusion coffeemaker. This one-cup brewing system uses coffee packs that brew a single cup at a time with the touch of a button. Here is my review of the Flavia Fusion, based on some key characteristics. CONVENIENCE AND EASE OF USE The Flavia Fusion coffee maker is so easy to use. You just fill the water reservoir (which holds a lot of water, you do not need to fill it for every cup), pop in the coffee pack of your choice, and press a button. It is quick, convenient, and very easy to use. NO CLEANING! This is perhaps my favorite feature of my Flavia Fusion coffee machine. I hate cleaning the coffee pot and filter, and would often leave the mess in the sink after my morning coffee for later. There were many mornings I would wake up and stumble into the kitchen to make my morning brew, only to find a mess in the kitchen that I neglected to clean from the previous morning. Not a good way to start the day. With the Flavia Fusion, there is no clean up. All I need to do is removed the used filter pack and throw it in the trash. VARIETY AND COST The Flavia Fusion has a price tag of $99, much less than a lot of the other single cup brewers out there. It does not have all of the bells and whistles of some of the other brands, but I found it to be a

Summary on The Book of the Courtier by Baldassar...

The Book of the Courtier Summary The Book of the Courtier by Baldassar Castiglione was the book of proper etiquette for men and women from 1528 to the end of the 18th century. This book was found in French, Latin, Spanish, Dutch, English, German, and Polish. This book was written in a dialogue well, four different dialogues, with each dialogue pushing and explaining different â€Å"rules† that needed to be fallowed if a person was considered to be high class; these rules were basically held as law to most of the high class citizens of Europe. There are some rules that are able to be paired or grouped together because they either said the same thing or were pointing towards the same major point on how to act; some of these major key points†¦show more content†¦Many of the rules are still kept up in today’s society. The rules that are no longer in place include being born into a wealthy family, do not boast/ brag, do not spread rumors, do not lead on someone of the opposite sex unless they are of the same social status as you- poor or rich-, speak in multiple languages-French, Italian, and Spanish-, be graceful within everything you do, do not do sports- ladies-, be knowledgeable, make sure that your armor is well kept and taken care of-gentlemen-, be able to fight in a tournament and against a range of weapons-gentlemen-, and act as if you were a person of the court. The amount of rules, like these, that are still in affect are dress for success, treat everyone with respect, be kind, treat your other as if he/she was you-if you are in a relationship-, be ladylike/gentlemanlike, be courteous, and have friends close by. The three major categories that have been mentioned, respect, leadership, and social image, were the ways that a person with a high ranking of social order would act in public and within their own homes. The Book of The Courtier by Baldassar Castiglione was the base of the modern day books on proper etiquette; yet, the rules are now not only for the rich bu t also for the

Management Tools for Implementation of Food - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss about the Management Tools for Implementation of Food. Answer: Introduction ISO 22000 is applicable to food chain in order to ensure food safety management system. After getting certified under ISO 22000 companies can ensure that they are providing best quality products to their customers. This helps the organisation in establishing good image in the eyes of society (Lombardo et.al 2017). Now a days due to increase in health awareness among the customers its essential for the organisations to pay attention over their quality stuff if they want to expand their business and win over their competitors. This approach is widely used by all the countries who are the member of international organisations of standards. In this report complete discussion will be carried on clauses of the standard, places where it is applicable, positive as well as its negative side, practical examples to prove the same, different countries where it is been used, comparison with the other established standard and different ways in which it is beneficial for the customers and companies. Parts (clauses) of standard Appropriate procedures are developed by the government which clearly lay down all the responsibilities, activities, input as well as output. There are total 10 clauses under ISO 22000:2005. Some of them may include- establishing control over documents (cl. 4.2.2) and records (cl. 4.2.3), response to emergency (cl. 5.7), monitoring PRPs (cl. 7.5 c) and some critical points where points important to establish control (cl. 7.6.4), proper handling of products that are unsafe in nature (cl. 7.10.4).Apart from this special focus is laid on certain clause like-taking corrective actions (cl. 7.10.2) and conducting internal audits (cl. 8.4.1) (Ryan, 2017). There are certain clauses that have created problem for the people are- Management of responsibility under this employee have to work as per the instructions given by their heads. This means if the company wants to focus over the quality of food then top management have to take certain strong steps. Maintenance of appropriate human resource it focuses on establishing competent work environment within the firm.These entire clauses under the ISO 22000 will ensure that the firm will provide its best quality product to the society. Application Only those organisations that are dealing in food line can send the application in order to obtain certificate from an accredited ISO body. ISO 22000 involves all the principles of HACCP. It stands for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Standards. Application was not so easy for the government so, 12 major steps were taken by Codex Alimentarius in terms of audit. Soon the association realised that different range of hazards occur at different processing stages. So, organisations have to prepare proper documents to know the reason behind occurrence of these hazards and different ways in which they can be overcome. One survey was made to know how much effect was laid by ISO 22000 over the firms. Comparison was made between 25 big poultry producers and small farms. At the end results were quite favourable because all the firms that were able to produce good quality stuff which increased export market by 72%. As this was one of the biggest sources of the revenue for the government so, with the proper support of the government large scale industrialist were able to overcome all the risk involved in this segment (Soares, Vicente Martins, 2015). Good and bad sides of ISO 22000 standard Good sides (Varzakas, 2015). This helped the organisation in maintaining consistency in the food stuff that they offer to the society. Helps in building confidence in management and the team members that whatever procedures they are following are the best and safe for their customers. Customers as well the stakeholders feel safe as well as confident on the ability of the firm to control all the hazards involved in food line. ISO 22000 helps in establishing control over food supply chain of the firm. Bad sides Clause 7.2 of the same standard does not give clear explanation regarding different ways to implement PRP. This standard does not focus on the requirements of the GMP that is good manufacturing practices nor does it tell how GMP can be implemented. Companies have to bearer loose in the customers because of the lack of clarity of clauses mentioned under this standard (Todorovic Kojic, 2017). These are the two major reasons behind the move made by the firms from ISO 22000 to FSSC 22000. Practical examples There are many industries that have to perform the work as per the clauses and the standards established under ISO 22000. Organisation that are actively engaged in providing sea food directly to the consumers or are involved in trading activities have to match all the standards under ISO 22000 (Psomas Kafetzopoulos, 2015). Apart from this there are few food chains that have established their branches in different parts of the world such as MC Donalds and Pizza hut have maintained their quality for the long period in order to obtain ISO22000 certificate. These standards ensure that whatever food is provided by the companies is up to the mark. Further it also helps the companies to access all the risk areas as well the issues on time so that steps can be taken in order to improve them within the short time span. Subway is the fast food chain that is providing many services from its retail chain. This firm was able to establish its images in the eyes of the customers because of its taste as well as its quality stuff. At the initial stage it was quite difficulty for the organisation to maintain its quality in all the chains but after overcoming the entire hurdles firm was able to maintain quality in transportation networks, food materials, sea food and many more. This helps the organisation in making new and separate image in the eyes of society members. Standard usage in different countries Asia being an agriculture country certain standards are established by the ISO in order to ensure that only those products will be exported that are of good quality as this help in developing favourable image in the eyes of the other nation. These standards ensure safety in management of food industry (Varzakas Manolopoulou, 2017). USA this country pay more attention on the health of its citizens. Under the ISO 22000 major focus is laid on agricultural, production as well as distribution practice. Along with it special steps are taken in order to maintain sanitation, pest control, disposal of waste and many more (Soares, Vicente Martins, 2015). Comparison with other standards ISO 22000 is totally different from ISO 26000 and HACCP. As major focus of ISO 22000 is laid on maintaining safety in the food management system where as ISO 26000 is one of the international standards that are established to ensure that all the organisation should undertake their social responsibility as that will; enable them indirectly helpful for their their mission as well as their vision statement, employees as well as the stakeholders. On the other hand ISO 22000 is totally different from HACCP because HACCP is one of the systems that focus on maintaining safety in food. Apart from this both are based on different principles (Kendirli Ulusoy, 2014). HACCP focuses on identification all the critical issues and hazards that are present in the process of production and at the end developing an appropriate system to monitor the results. Whereas, ISO22000 principles may include continues improvement in management system, developing an appropriate planning and taking correct steps for operating PRPs. Under this standard proper major are taken in order to analyse the risk. Benefits to customers and companies Establishment of standards are beneficial for both the companies as well for the customers in many ways Benefits to customers Ensuring consumption of goods that are safe for them as the customers know that wherever food stuff they are in taking belongs to a good quality so, this will help them in taking care of their healthy in best way and lead a healthy life. Apart from this customers are able to recognise which food that is good and safe for them and which is not (Maheshwari Mehta, 2016). Reduction in diseases that are caused because of food products that are produced as per the standards will ensure reduction in overall diseases that are caused due to intake of poor quality food. Benefits to companies Increase in overall profitability -All the organisations such as Mc Donalds and Subway that are operating their business in the different parts of the world will be able to enjoy high profitability because by provide good quality products to their consumers the organisation will not only be able to expand its business but it will also be able to enhance their customer group all these things will indirectly increase the profitability of the firm (Armeanu, Vintila Gherghina, 2017). Working with efficiency in documentation and procedures under the ISO 22000 food chain industries either have to update their existing tools as well as their equipments or they have to procure new once so that they can maintain standard in their food stuff. This will indirectly help the organisation to take the benefits of all the updated technologies. Conclusion From the above report it can be concluded that, industries that are actively engaged in food zone are facing many challenges and one of the biggest challenges is to provide food that is safe and best in quality. However in order to ensure same many steps are taken by the government but still there are certain Ares in the sea food zone which need to be improve more so that people do not face any problem because for the food they are eating and lead a healthy life (Varzakas Tzia, 2015). References Lombardo, A., Boselli, C., Amatiste, S., Ninci, S., Frazzoli, C., Dragone, R., ... Brajon, G. (2017). From invention to innovation: risk analysis to integrate One Health technology in the dairy farm.Frontiers in public health,5. Ryan, J. M. (2017).Guide to Food Safety and Quality During Transportation: Controls, Standards and Practices. Academic Press. Soares, N. F., Vicente, A. A., Martins, C. M. (2015).Food safety in the seafood industry: a practical guide for ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 implementation. John Wiley Sons. Varzakas, T. (2015). 4 ISO 22000, HACCP, and Other Management Tools for Implementation of Food Safety-Traceability Case Studies.Handbook of Food Processing: Food Safety, Quality, and Manufacturing Processes,35, 105. Todorovic, G., Kojic, V. (2017). IMPACT OF REALIZED IMS SYSTEM IN PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF WATER ON QUALITY OF LIFE.International Journal for Quality Research,11(1). Psomas, E. L., Kafetzopoulos, D. P. (2015). HACCP effectiveness between ISO 22000 certified and non-certified dairy companies.Food Control,53, 134-139. Varzakas, T., Manolopoulou, E. (2017). Comparison of HACCP and ISO 22000 in the Ready-to-Eat Fruit and Vegetable Industry in Conjunction with Application of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) and Ishikawa Diagrams. InMinimally Processed Refrigerated Fruits and Vegetables(pp. 685-721). Springer US. Soares, N. F., Vicente, A. A., Martins, C. M. (2015).Food safety in the seafood industry: a practical guide for ISO 22000 and FSSC 22000 implementation. John Wiley Sons. Kendirli, H. C., Ulusoy, G. (2014). Food Quality Certificates and Research on Effect of Food Quality Certificates to Determinate Ignored Level of Buying Behavioral: A Case Study in Hitit University Feas Business Department.Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People,3(4), 37-46. Maheshwari, D., Mehta, S. (2016). impact of iso on quality of product in industries. Armeanu, S. D., Vintila, G., Gherghina, S. C. (2017). A Cross-Country Empirical Study Towards the Impact of Following ISO Management System Standards on Euro-Area Economic Confidence.Amfiteatru Economic,19(44), 144. Varzakas, T., Tzia, C. (Eds.). (2015).Handbook of food processing: food safety, quality, and manufacturing processes(Vol. 35). CRC Press. Escanciano, C., Santos-Vijande, M. L. (2014). Reasons and constraints to implementing an ISO 22000 food safety management system: Evidence from Spain.Food Control,40, 50-57.

American Literature Finals Study Guide Flashcard

American Literature: Finals Study Guide